Skip to content

September 17, 2009

Bringing Manufacturing Back in America

Another BusinessWeek piece, this time about efforts to shift the tide of manufacturing plants back into the United States. As one of the foundational pillars of a vibrant economy, this effort is important, and is one of the reasons we need to fix R&D (as noted in my post of a few days ago).

Much of the blame lies with U.S. government policy. Nations in Asia and Europe aggressively court strategic high-tech industries with generous tax breaks, cash grants, cheap credit, low-cost utilities, and speedy regulatory approval. Governments prize such plants because they serve as broad economic catalysts. Besides skilled jobs, they spur parts suppliers, construction work, services, and the creation of big engineering forces that are the pillars of new industries and companies.

By comparison, the U.S. has been indifferent to manufacturing. Even when tax breaks are factored in, American corporate taxes are among the highest in the industrialized world, according to a World Bank study. Nor does the U.S. simply exempt certain industrial investments from taxes, as does much of Asia.

Most U.S. states do offer tax breaks and financial aid to lure big plants, hoping to recoup the cost with income taxes generated by new jobs. But state taxes pale beside federal levies, and state budgets for subsidies are limited. “The states are playing with peanuts, while other countries play with real money,” says Clyde V. Prestowitz Jr., president of the Economic Strategy Institute, a Washington think tank. Also, it can take two years to obtain all the environmental, health, and safety permits for a modern electronics plant—a lifetime in the tech world.

“The political guys in Washington don’t have their minds around the fact that the climate for manufacturing here is really hostile,” says Joseph R. Laia Jr., CEO of Santa Clara (Calif.) solar cell startup MiaSolé, which is trying to decide whether to build its first major plant in the U.S., Europe, or Asia.

Building a wall around the United States won’t work. We’re going to have to make our systems be competitive so we can be a magnet for the high-margin innovation and manufacturing that we used to lead the world in.

One effort close to home is the Sierra College Center for Applied Competitive Technology, where we’re working to help manufacturers with technical training and workforce development. These are great efforts, and I applaud them, but it’s going to take work at the state and federal level to make a dent in this problem — and we need to, quickly.

» Read the Entire Article

  • georgerebane

    Unfortunately attempting to redeem manufacturing in the US is not hindered by the shortage of trained workers and lack of technology. As I have tried to point out in The Union and on RR, it is that our trained workers demand too much compensation compared to their overseas competitors, and our government is now firmly on the path to styming entrepreneurial enterprises and business in general. To the extent that we focus on and celebrate such 'centers' as solutions to the problem, we are taking our eyes off the prize. The centers are necessary for workforce retraining and getting the new generation up to speed, but they offer nothing to solve the immediate problems created by an increasingly socialist government.

  • http://www.aaronklein.com aaronklein

    Well, if you re-read my last paragraph, I made the point that CACT wasn't going to make a dent in this problem on its own, and that we need a lot more work at the state and federal level.

    I'm not sure I completely agree that wages are the reason manufacturing has been driven out. That's certainly the case with unionized manufacturing, but especially in this labor market, non-unionized manufacturing can set wage rates that are competitive, especially for high-value, high-tech manufacturing.

    The bigger issue – which I was trying to draw attention to – was the lack of competitiveness in the federal and state tax codes for US manufacturing. These other countries offer incentives to bring good jobs to their shores, and we've got one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. We're driving companies like GE, who still make aircraft engines here, to explore other options, and that's not driven solely or even primarily by wage rates.

    Not saying the tax structure is a silver bullet either, but it's an awfully big part of the problem.

blog comments powered by Disqus