Because I’m involved in public service, and know a lot of the public officials in our area, I’m often asked my opinion about contests on the ballot. (For those of you who don’t live in the Sierra Foothills in Northern California, feel free to skip this post if it bores you!)
Here in Placer County where I live, we’ve had a series of poor decisions made by our county staff when it comes to safeguarding taxpayer dollars. It annoys me when I hear about $1,600 dinners and private jet flights and the like. There is no good excuse for using taxpayer money in that way. If there really is that much to go around, then we should be rebating this surplus money back to the taxpayers.
I don’t know Katherine Martinis, our incumbent Auditor-Controller, on a personal basis. From everything I’ve heard, she’s a very nice person. However, she has been quoted several times as saying it’s not her job to “tattle” on the spending habits of county staff.
I respectfully disagree.
The reason that the Auditor-Controller is an elected job is so that we have someone accountable to us who will be a watchdog on county spending. I want an Auditor-Controller who will use every tool in the toolbox to watch out for taxpayers and sound the alarm when bad decisions are being made.
There’s a young, energetic guy named Casey Tanner who is running for Auditor-Controller. I’ve met him and I’m impressed by his desire to shine the spotlight on our county government’s spending. I think he deserves our support.
This is probably an issue of different skill sets for the job. Matching the right person with the right job is tough to do, and from everything I’ve heard, Katherine Martinis is good at the pieces of the job she is doing. She just doesn’t want to take on the public role that I think this elected office demands.
So my advice to Casey Tanner, if he gets elected: interview Katherine Martinis for the job of Deputy Auditor-Controller. You can set policy for the office and do the public role that she doesn’t want to do. She can help you navigate the bureaucracy inside the county. No guarantee I’m right, and you’d have to be able to develop some trust before you make that hire, but I have a feeling it might work out well.
Bottom line: while our existing sheriff is great when it comes to law enforcement, we need a new sheriff in town when it comes to auditing and controlling spending. I think Casey Tanner is the right choice.