If We Can’t Afford to Lose, Play to Win

Let’s leave beside the question of whether or not Iraq was the right war. During the 2008 presidential election, President Obama said we needed to pull out of Iraq so that we can double down on a “war of necessity” (as he termed it) in Afghanistan.
Instead, the President and his foreign policy team have been locked in a multi-month prolonged period of indecision. Meanwhile, precious time has slipped away that could have been used to develop the security needed to make political progress in the country — the strategy employed by Secretary Gates that worked in Iraq.
On Sunday, David Broder — one of the longtime political journalists at the Washington Post — opened the floodgates of question about this lack of decisiveness by the President.
The more President Obama examines our options in Afghanistan, the less he likes the choices he sees. But, as the old saying goes, to govern is to choose — and he has stretched the internal debate to the breaking point.
The cost of indecision is growing every day. Americans, our allies who have contributed their own troops to the struggle against al-Qaeda and the Taliban, and the Afghans and their government are waiting impatiently, while the challenge is getting worse.
…The president, notwithstanding his earlier rhetoric and actions, has hesitated to resolve the issue. Obama needs to remember what Clark Clifford, one of Harry Truman’s closest advisers, said: that the president “believed that even a wrong decision was better than no decision at all.”
…Meantime, events in Afghanistan support McChrystal’s prediction that delay in expanding the U.S. troop commitment will almost certainly lead to gains for the Taliban and greater risk for U.S. and allied troops.
…Given all of this, I don’t see how Obama can refuse to back up the commander he picked and the strategy he is recommending. It may not work if the country truly is ungovernable. But I think we have to gamble that security will bring political progress — as it has done in Iraq.
Obama did not believe that could happen there. But given what he inherited, and given what he has done so far, I think he has no choice but to play out that hand. If we can’t afford to lose, then play to win.
What do you think? Is the President simply trying to make a thorough decision, or is he “dithering” as Broder and others have said? Can we afford to lose in Afghanistan?






